Skip to main content

Washington, July 12, 2003.
In recent days, senior White House officials, including Karl Rove, have called leading journalists with information concerning the wife of former ambassador Joseph P. Wilson IV. Wilson, an administration critic, has charged that the White House knew president Bush's claim concerning Iraq seeking uranium from Niger was false, when he made mention of this in his State of the Union Address. According to the calls made by administration officials, Valerie (Plame) Wilson has worked as an undercover CIA operative for years, dealing with WMD issues. The White House officials are claiming that it was Wilson's wife who sent him to Niger on a fact-finding mission. Following his trip to Niger, ambassador Wilson filed a report contradicting the administration's alarmist Iraqi WMD claims that took the nation to war. (cont. p.2)


Observers believe the White House outing of Valerie (Plame) Wilson is vengeance as ambassador Wilson's claims have hugely embarrassed the administration.

The CIA is filing criminal charges against the administration officials in question.
"The outing of a CIA operative is a disaster for our agency. Not just because it compromises the operations this employee was engaged in, but because it will endanger all our field operatives, as their contacts can come to believe they will be outed for cheap political gain," said CIA director George Tenet, as he met with Dept. of Justice head John Ashcroft to discuss the extent of the criminal charges that will be brought against the White House officials in question.
When asked to comment, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer declined to give a statement as this went to press.


That's what should have been in the NYTimes, on July 12, 2003.
It wasn't - and that's because Miller was collaborating with the officials in question. That's why she is in jail now, because the scandal threatening her and her newspaper is of a proportion sufficient to make the Jayson Blair fracas seem insignificant and she'd rather not go into the details. What we have here, is a sense of hubris capturing the press. They allowed themselves to be embedded in Iraq, but they have also been in bed with "movers and shakers" for years, having been seduced by the chance to be close to power, and maybe even exercise a little power themselves. (To clarify - given the second post below: I have made this up. But this is what should have been in the NYTimes, if the paper hadn't been doing the administration's work, instead of informing the public).

Originally posted to self-evident on Sat Jul 16, 2005 at 10:59 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  you got it about right (none)
    but there should also have been an editorial that same day saying the Times decision to FIRE Judith Miller 2 yrs. ago for her propagandizing instead of reporting was given more vindication by this report.

    by ctkeith on Sat Jul 16, 2005 at 06:01:44 AM PDT

  •  Please attribute to sources (none)
    Is the first part a direct quote from the New York Times? What about the rest?
  •  Yep (none)
    This is exactly what the problem is.

    Where was that story?

    Why wasn't it written?

    Every time Monica Lewinsky went to the gym, there were two front page stories in the New York Times and an editorial condemning the Clintons.

    What is the story here?

    "Ladies and gentlemen, the Bushes aren't married. They have an arrangement." -- Rush Limbaugh.

    by bink on Sat Jul 16, 2005 at 06:24:04 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site